Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Posts Tagged ‘human purpose and human design’

What if we were to consider all the different paths, taken by those on spiritual journeys throughout history, as an interconnected network, like our brain? When we do something new, our brain creates a new connection; if we repeat this process, a well-traveled energetic path is formed. And every one of these paths forms the greater network of our brain. So, has a similar process happened by the creation of energetic pathways through history, by this species? And is that greater network available to everyone born here now? (At the end of this post there are instructions and a link to download this recording to your computer.)

John: Well, for me, I had to maintain the recognition and connection in relationship to a void.

To begin with I was wondering if I was going to be able to do that, based upon something of an effect, that had occurred, that had caused a certain kind of overindulgence in the seeing, yet at the same time utilizing, in that overindulgence, an aliveness that can be quickened in a shamanistic side of oneself.

And I was able to do this more easily than I usually do, with a greater ease than I usually do, because, number one, I have a flexibility to something of a stillness space, or void depth, that I don’t necessarily know how I have that, but I have that, and that helps to facilitate a sight. And there’s a certain quality of something that’s denser in a spaciality and that tends to facilitate something that’s grounded. 

So, the theme of the dreaming was can I be, and maintain, something more, in terms of myself, in relationship to the shamanistic zone, which is really located more in the bottom of the breath? And it holds a person, when it’s in the bottom of the breath, into a particular modality because it has a chi about it that can hold one’s attention. 

And that a person is more than the shamanistic side of themself, but can you maintain that something more in the face of the chi that can be louder in its physical, magnetic presence or something? Can you use that chi for atmospheric purposes? Holding something together in terms of the atmosphere? 

Or can you speak through the chi and affect the atmosphere, and, at the same time, do so in a way that keeps something, and recognizes something, more in the void? In other words, go beyond the chi mannerism that can hold things in track. 

I have to look at it this way. You seem to have to look at in terms of what it’s like in terms of holding a quality of a space in relationship to the stuff that is going on. I hold that in terms of an actionability. You hold it in terms of a quality of trying to recognize and see if you’re able to maintain yourself in the space of something where there are things going on. I look at it in terms of an actionability, but it better be an actionability that isn’t infected by an overindulgence of this part of one’s makeup.

To download this file, Right Click (for PCs) or Control Click (for Macs) and Save: Beyond the Chi

Read Full Post »

Monarch Butterfly Perched on Pink Flower

In one way or another, every form of life is compelled toward certain things during its existence. Bees are compelled to build hives, salmon are compelled to swim upstream, and butterflies are compelled to migrate 1000s of miles. These urges are built into their design. So what about humans? Yes, we have the standard physical urges that guarantee continuance of the species, but we also have urges to seek, and grow, and connect, and evolve; to explore and discover new possibilities. And who, or what, is the greatest beneficiary of these compulsions? (At the end of this post there are instructions and a link to download this recording to your computer.)

John: And in this other [dream], I wish I’d written it up straightaway because, again, I have this at such a deep inner level, when I hear it from this place it makes so much sense, and is so simple, to me that I don’t bring it through and write it up in manifestation, so to speak, because it seems trite. But when I do, it’s meaningful.

So I just remembered the one thing, and that was I am told that it is a crime to be merely swept away. And there was another line that preceded this, and it was like a type of poem, and what I realized that we were talking about, and what it meant, was that in creation you’re there for a reason.

You don’t just then complain and try to get out of it and go to the expanse of things, to seek that, without taking on what you’re here for, which is to be able to bring all of that into play. To go to where you’re swept away into the expanse is a crime.

And so I’m just sitting here and pondering various statements that have been made that kind of portray that. And I remember that it has been said that the angels quest for a human body so they can come closer to God. So I guess if you get in a human body and blow it, then that’s like a crime because you went to all of this effort and then when you got here you were too dumb to know better.

It has also been said that we want union, God wants separation, so we accept what God wants trusting that there is a promise of both. And that’s the noodling inside that happens where you have the quality of a union when you let go of the limitations that you take on, that holds you back, that happens in a dense world where you’re always contending with things and are contending with them with the senses. You can get caught thinking that that’s how it works.

And then there’s that union state, or that state where there’s an interconnectivity where the soul expands, and from that is the access of everything that you need.

It is also said that God holds a soul between two fingers. One minute he turns us away, and the next minute he turns us back to him, which again is like going to the inner on the in-breath in, back to a home, and then the out-breath back out into creation where it can be confusing and bewildering again – and the yearning and longing start up.

There is also the statement that to be able to be in God when he is not present is the deepest state a human being can reach. In other words, how can you be in God, when he’s not present and reach such a deep state, if you refuse to accept that and only want it your way as a union, and therefore reject the creation of things?

So to sum up, we are in a human body and while in this condition need to accept the greater purpose of such a state. To throw it away is like a crime in that this blows a golden opportunity to be in a oneness, and the opportunity to bring the eyes and ears of the creator into his creation.

To download this file, Right Click (for PCs) or Control Click (for Macs) and Save: Eyes and Ears

 

Read Full Post »

Concept of choice with crossroads spliting in two waysThe mechanism of instinct, which we see throughout the animal kingdom, is an automatic process to allow survival and growth into the fullness of a life’s possibility. In the human there is a further level of this mechanism – freedom of choice. It says we don’t always have to do what’s best for us, i.e., we can fast for days, against our instinct to eat. Yet it is our consciousness that guides us at this level, and, in its best usage, should also contribute to our ability to survive and grow into our potential. So, understanding how to utilize this gift of creation – freedom of choice – is critical to our possibility as individuals, and as a species. (At the end of this post there are instructions and a link to download this recording to your computer.)

John: Well, my dream started off, in which I had to set the equation of what things are like when you’re in a world in which consciousness does not come into the equation, that maybe you’re still operating on the basis of instinct. And yet even that is not very loud. It’s almost as if even that’s still in a kind of amnesia, or something.

Because I find myself just merely looking at myself in a kind of matter of fact way. I mean, I’m not pushed this way, I’m not pushed that way; I’m kind of blase. In other words, the image is just as neutral as neutral could get. Which also means that I have no opinion one way or another, in terms of what I’m seeing, let alone what to do. So I have no opinion what I’m seeing, even.

Well, that’s not quite true. At least, I have no opinion in terms of having to make choices, yet, because where there is an opinion, that is when I will find myself having to contend with things. So I’m in a state yet where there isn’t the sorting out differentiation, on a conscious level, having to go at it.

So what I see is just the layout, a layout that hasn’t been mobilized into a flow yet. In other words, a layout that’s just the setup. And, of course, I see a person in this setup, and that this person has no opinion – in terms of distinguishing or making conscious choices that this person carries within – access to two lights. And one hue of light is whatever they do in that regard just kind of unfolds. It doesn’t have to have much consciousness, or anything, just will take and unfold. Very blase, in other words, not much catalytic, the beginning and the end of that just has no storyline to it, because it’s just bing, bing, bing, just all natural. Doesn’t have to even be conscious it’s so natural.

But the other light disrupts, has kind of an agitation, or negative, quality to it that when you go off in that, there’s going to be damage, there’s going to be obstruction. I note that I have these two qualities of life, but kind of trust to the fact that I’m not yet thinking about it, so to speak, because, as far as I seem to be I just kind of assume, because there’s no conscious choice, I just assume everything’s going to be okay – as if I’m automatically always going to be doing the things that are with the other light, even though there’s nothing there that shows a depth as to why it should be so.

So there I find myself looking at myself. I’m in this matter of fact way, in other words, not having to make a distinguishment, not making a distinction, in other words, not having a conscious orientation. Or, you might say, lacking a freedom of choice, yet. And so there is no drama. And, like I’ve described above, one way is kind of deleterious to things, and it now has the image of being a little bit like a poisonous snake. You can feel the Kundalini of it. It’s poisonous. It’s scary. It’s dangerous.

And it’s visible and has a very particular color orientation to that way of being. It has one of those colors, like if you go into the southwestern deserts, the snake you have to watch out for is one that has of really bright reddish color or something.

And so, as I sit like this, it’s kind of an ambivalency. I haven’t yet gained a certain stream of evolution clicking in my nature. What I’m looking at, because there isn’t the conscious effect, there’s nothing to see or report. The action starts, and the journey of the soul begins, when you have to contend with more or less all the levels, or you have to partake in the vibrational lights. You have to intertwine with them, put them into how they need to be, because it’s only one light.

So what is going on is it’s a little bit like starting off in the Garden of Eden. It’s as if, for reasons I can’t put my finger on, I just am, and all is well – until something causes me to go off limits in my well being, and then what isn’t right, or isn’t properly taken into acceptance and ingratiation within, gets the best of me.

But, for the longest time, I don’t see myself as being able to make a conscious this, that, or the other – or a freedom of choice. So how can one go astray? And yet, what is good is known somehow. And what is bad, I can simply ignore. But you can’t, in other words, we’re more conscious than that, we’re not living in a total subjective state. You have the objective side, too.

So the significance of this dream is to be like this is to have no karma to contend with. It’s like having no karma, it means you’re not advanced enough to know how to play with the substances. You gotta have a sense of loss, you have to have consciousness. It’s like an animal responds by instinct, it doesn’t necessarily consciously sort this out, or that way, it’s very instinctual.

Consciousness is another step. So it’s like this light, at one point in time, or this quality, was even like a snake energy, or a Kundalini energy, that has kind of a poisonous effect. Yet I don’t acknowledge that I have a shadow yet, because I’m not conscious. And because I’m not conscious, I don’t carry a self-consciousness that can see a delirium, or delusionality, or that something more of a clarity of a wisdom needs to be there – as an aspect of pulling the two together.

So at best, all I can say is that, what I’m portraying and describing is kind of talking about what is like a kind of insipid state, prior to freedom of choice.

To download this file, Right Click (for PCs) or Control Click (for Macs) and Save: A Stream of Evolution

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »