Nothing can be undone. That sounds serious, but what is meant by it is that everything created exists, energetically, and, in a sense, everything is different from then on. This is as true for an idle thought as it is for a profound intention – although the latter may have much more energy associated with it. And that tells us something else: when we want an idea to grow into a reality, we must constantly feed it, energetically, until it can manifest in the world as an amalgamation of material forms. (At the end of this post there are instructions and a link to download this recording to your computer.)
John: Now understanding the time, the out-breath time element, which I came down here understanding, but didn’t understand the spaciousness. And then the spaciousness opened as follows.
First of all, I go into, and re-familiarize myself, knowing full well what time is. And so I go back into the time orb of things and lay out the time orb of things as the best way that I know how to get to the point where I can try to flip it – to show what this then needs to be in terms of spaciousness.
So, in the meditation dream, what has changed is the relationship that I have to what is happening within. In prior dreams there is a component of the dream world that I’m able to notice directly. That component is the thought; in other words, it’s in the out-breath, that’s why there is a movement to something that is coming through.
In the prior dreams, I am coming to know thoughts as time. I have been able to perceive the substance of the thought, and its effect upon the breath, by it being in an overallness, or intertwined overallness. Or, you might say, that intertwined overallness is in a stillness. So I’m able to note, upon the out-breath, the fluidness of time, and, in doing so, note what is accepted by the heart. Because the heart is just an overallness, and if something doesn’t fit, or comport, with what is meant to be, then it’s not going to fit, it’s not going to be okay with the heart.
So, in this prior dreaming, I have been able to put a dollar value on time. In doing so I’m able to quantify its value to the overall intertwined essence of the heart. Now, because something comes through as a thought, and the thought, then, vies for the heart, and the heart knows that it holds a greater overallness – and so this sort of thing stands out in a differentiation, it’s going to be louder, so it’s going to have more dollar value.
But the key here, in this case, is less dollar value for it to be more real. If it can be worthless, in a sense, then it would fit naturally into the heart. So, in doing so, I’m able to perceive if what is unfolding in life is acceptable or not at this time. Yet the value of a vibratory thought substance causes a weightiness to strike the heart, because it’s heavier in weight and value, I see this weightiness as a density and bifurcated effect that takes something away from the heart’s essence.
Because the effect, which involves time, whether something is right to be, and if it’s not right to be it’s going to stab the heart because it’s too weighty, contracts down and pinches that way into being too condensed, thus too linear. I’m able to denote that what is allowed, for shift purposes, and that which is not. And I say that in terms of shift purposes because we’re shifting. And so we’re trying to find a new time paradigm as well. Things have to be measured in terms of a new time paradigm.
So, in this way, I am able to confront the doingness, because that which is a thought involves a kind of Dharma, if it’s followed through far enough as a thought, and that that is a type of doingness. And does that have merit at this time, or not? I have come to know that what I identify as a flow of time, I’ve come to know whether it’s acceptable at this time. And so, from this, I’m able to respond without hurting the overall intertwined heart design. If it’s meant to be in the flow, or if it’s meant to be.
This is looking at it from a time standpoint, yet. What I described I already know. Last night I was confronted with a subtler substance upon the heart that is a type of rising up on the in-breath. There is information in the spaciousness that I’m seeking to know. This is harder because there isn’t the same focus and attention for spaciousness as there is for time. In the dream, I am seeking to quantify the spaciousness for orientation purposes. I am seeing it as set. So I’m trying to break it. In other words, how do you speed it up? Or how do you make the spaciousness come in and let itself know where something fits into the overallness. Time is one thing, spaciousness is yet there, too; is the other half.
So I’m having to look at the spaciousness, an aspect of the in-breath, for its value orientation so I can denote, in an invisibleness light, the orientation, because you don’t quite see it but you experience it, you witness it somehow within yourself in a greater orientation.
So I could tell on the out-breath the time effect of a thought, which tells me whether or not what is coming into life is embraced at this time by the heart. But what I am not able to denote yet is that in what one is to behold, whether the heart is able to accept the unfolding in a spaciousness, and that’s done on the in-breath. That’s what discerns what is meant to be or not.
Because that part is not discernible when I seek to reduce the subtle essence, in which I factor “time is money,” so to speak, and use the imagery in which there is a dollar value as a kind of inflectiveness on the heart, which I can do in an imagery on the out-breath, this doesn’t do anything for me in terms of the subtle substance effect in a spaciousness – there’s no dollar value to it. And because there’s no way of quantifying that, I can’t do it.
To download this file, Right Click (for PCs) or Control Click (for Macs) and Save: Substance of Thought